'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]'
------------------------------
Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem:    innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
  Rules:
    {  a(x1) -> b(x1)
     , a(c(x1)) -> c(c(c(a(b(x1)))))
     , b(b(x1)) -> a(x1)}

Details:         
  We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs:
   {  a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))
    , a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))
    , b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))}
  
  The usable rules are:
   {  b(b(x1)) -> a(x1)
    , a(x1) -> b(x1)
    , a(c(x1)) -> c(c(c(a(b(x1)))))}
  
  The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges:
   {a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
     ==> {b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))}
   {a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))}
     ==> {a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))}
   {a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))}
     ==> {a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
   {b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))}
     ==> {a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))}
   {b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))}
     ==> {a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
  
  We consider the following path(s):
   1) {  a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))
       , b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))
       , a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))}
      
      The usable rules for this path are the following:
      {  b(b(x1)) -> a(x1)
       , a(x1) -> b(x1)
       , a(c(x1)) -> c(c(c(a(b(x1)))))}
      
        We have applied the subprocessor on the union of usable rules and weak (innermost) dependency pairs.
        
          'Weight Gap Principle'
          ----------------------
          Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
          Input Problem:    innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
            Rules:
              {  b(b(x1)) -> a(x1)
               , a(x1) -> b(x1)
               , a(c(x1)) -> c(c(c(a(b(x1)))))
               , a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))
               , b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))
               , a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))}
          
          Details:         
            We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
            {  a(x1) -> b(x1)
             , a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
            and weakly orienting the rules
            {}
            using the following strongly linear interpretation:
              Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
              
              {  a(x1) -> b(x1)
               , a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
              
              Details:
                 Interpretation Functions:
                  a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
                  c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [3]
              
            Finally we apply the subprocessor
            We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
            {a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))}
            and weakly orienting the rules
            {  a(x1) -> b(x1)
             , a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
            using the following strongly linear interpretation:
              Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
              
              {a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))}
              
              Details:
                 Interpretation Functions:
                  a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
                  b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
                  a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [2]
                  c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
              
            Finally we apply the subprocessor
            We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
            {b(b(x1)) -> a(x1)}
            and weakly orienting the rules
            {  a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))
             , a(x1) -> b(x1)
             , a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
            using the following strongly linear interpretation:
              Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
              
              {b(b(x1)) -> a(x1)}
              
              Details:
                 Interpretation Functions:
                  a(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
                  b(x1) = [1] x1 + [6]
                  c(x1) = [1] x1 + [9]
                  a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [5]
                  c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [2]
                  b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1]
              
            Finally we apply the subprocessor
            We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
            {b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))}
            and weakly orienting the rules
            {  b(b(x1)) -> a(x1)
             , a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))
             , a(x1) -> b(x1)
             , a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
            using the following strongly linear interpretation:
              Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
              
              {b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))}
              
              Details:
                 Interpretation Functions:
                  a(x1) = [1] x1 + [9]
                  b(x1) = [1] x1 + [6]
                  c(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
                  a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
                  c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [3]
                  c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
                  c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
              
            Finally we apply the subprocessor
            'fastest of 'combine', 'Bounds with default enrichment', 'Bounds with default enrichment''
            ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
            Input Problem:    innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to
              Strict Rules: {a(c(x1)) -> c(c(c(a(b(x1)))))}
              Weak Rules:
                {  b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))
                 , b(b(x1)) -> a(x1)
                 , a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))
                 , a(x1) -> b(x1)
                 , a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
            
            Details:         
              The problem was solved by processor 'Bounds with default enrichment':
              'Bounds with default enrichment'
              --------------------------------
              Answer:           YES(?,O(n^1))
              Input Problem:    innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to
                Strict Rules: {a(c(x1)) -> c(c(c(a(b(x1)))))}
                Weak Rules:
                  {  b^#(b(x1)) -> c_2(a^#(x1))
                   , b(b(x1)) -> a(x1)
                   , a^#(c(x1)) -> c_1(a^#(b(x1)))
                   , a(x1) -> b(x1)
                   , a^#(x1) -> c_0(b^#(x1))}
              
              Details:         
                The problem is Match-bounded by 0.
                The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton:
                {  b_0(3) -> 8
                 , c_0(3) -> 3
                 , a^#_0(3) -> 4
                 , a^#_0(8) -> 7
                 , c_0_0(6) -> 4
                 , c_0_0(9) -> 7
                 , b^#_0(3) -> 6
                 , b^#_0(8) -> 9
                 , c_1_0(7) -> 4
                 , c_2_0(4) -> 9}